CREAMCRACKERED
twenty four. canadian. british. poor college student. history. anthropology. hetalia. rise of the guardians. harry potter. trekkie. doctor who. the big bang theory. anime. memes. kingdom hearts. legend of zelda. pokemon. tiger and bunny. avengers. lotr. cosplayer. compulsive reblogger.


1 2 3 4 5 »
Im pretty sad that harley and ivy arent canon lesbians for eachother i mean cOME ON

Anonymous

elphabaforpresidentofgallifrey:

nannairb:

clintbarttons:

they

image

are

image

so

image

canon

image

i

image

dont

image

care

image

what

image

anyone

image

says

image

even babs knows

image

image

image

YOU FORGOT HARLEY’S REACTION TO THAT, ASKING IF SHE MEANS LIKE HOW PEOPLE SAY BATGIRL AND SUPERGIRL ARE FRIENDS

THEN BATGIRL CHANGES THE SUBJECT

SUPER LESBIANS DESERVE THEIR OWN SUPER SHOW

23 hours ago on July 22nd, 2014 | J | 28,214 notes

captbexx:

erm….. I watched Lilo & Stitch….

23 hours ago on July 22nd, 2014 | J | 6,899 notes
plays

chanyerrrrrr:

bestyoutubevideos:

Putting on pants without using hands

this was wild from start to finish

1 day ago on July 21st, 2014 | J | 138,236 notes

twinzik:

Becoming A Thornberry!

More on our FB page- http://facebook.com/twinzik.twins

2 days ago on July 21st, 2014 | J | 39,429 notes

the-goddamazon:

opalhonors:

mermaidsdream:

nathanael-platier:

noshamejustlove:

zorobro:

shota-purinsu:

zorobro:

linzthenerd:

theguilteaparty:

crippledcuriosity:

itsfondue:

Isn’t it nice how people twist their religious scripture to suit their weds but when it’s used against them it’s suddenly not okay

I talked to a monk about this quote once (we have mutual friends, and he came to a New Year’s Eve party at my shared art studio). He said this isn’t even talking about homosexuality. That the bible never actually says homosexuality is wrong. What that passage means is this:

Women were treated as subservient and it that you shouldn’t treat other men as subservient, like they are beneath you. It is not talking about homosexuality. If it was, it would say it outright since the bible lists other things outright.

I take the word of a monk who have studied the bible extensively more than a self proclaimed Christian.

The above text, I would like to point out is from the point of view of this translation of the original Hebrew. I spoke with my cousin’s rabbi on the matter and his response was different, saying that it was a mistranslation. See, the true translation says that a man shall not lie with another in the bed of a woman, which is to say, the Hebrews had a shit ton of rules about when a man was or was not allowed in a woman’s bed and private quarters (including, if she didn’t want you there, you weren’t allowed there. Hebrew women were also allowed to divorce their husbands and the image of the ‘oppressive Hebrew people’ is an image that was propogated by Christianity which, historically speaking, doesn’t treat the Jewish people too well and liked to paint them as being rather barbaric and backwards and cultish with their traditions, which, another piece of fun info, their traditions were one of the main reasons why the Jewish people were less likely, in medieval times, to die of the plague. Because washing your hands and avoiding the dead and vermin and the like was a lot of help. Of course the Christians persecuted them for not dying but that’s another matter. I’m sidetracked). So the verse is literally saying ‘Don’t fuck in some lady’s bed because that’s just goddamn rude’

Also, whenever a Christian brings the book of Leviticus up, you should feel free to point out that these are rules that were given to make the Hebrew people prepared for when the son of God came to earth. In Christianity, it’s believed the son of God was Jesus. So by following the rules set in Leviticus or pushing them as things we should follow, they’re saying that Jesus was not the son of God, and that Jesus did not, in fact, die for our sins. Jewish people believe, in their faith, that the son of God hasn’t yet been born, so many choose to follow these rules.

Most people of course roll their eyes when I explain the translation of the verse (full breakdown found here) but it’s always fun to point out the nature of the rules in Leviticus and the implications of following them. 

I’m a theology student and I am on the verge of crying because of how accurate this commentary is. Historical context is simultaneously the most interesting and most important part of interpreting any texts. 

Most religious people seem to base their beliefs on things that are severely mistranslated. I wish they would do their research before using the bible for hate.

I studied theology extensively and was going to become a theologist until I switched majors. The above commentary is 100% accurate and what I try to stress in a lot if conversations with Bible Thumpers.

Jesus also affirms the homosexual relationship between the Roman Centurion and his “slave”. The particular Greek word used to refer to this special slave was “pais”. Greek language studies and contexts show that a “pais” was a male love slave. Regular slaves were called “dolos”. The Centurion makes this distinction clearly when he asks Jesus to heal his slave (pais), and then to prove his status he tells Jesus that his slaves (dolos) go when he tells them to. But this slave (pais) was special. He was the Centurion’s lover.

Hearing this, Jesus was so amazed he says he had not found ANYONE ELSE who had such great faith. He then blesses the Centurion and heals his male lover.

Matthew 8:5-13

THIS IS WHAT THE BIBLE REALLY TEACHES ABOUT SAME SEX COUPLES.

In short, the English adaptation is a mistranslated farce.

^^^^this

reblogging for the comments ^^^^^^

Saving for later, in case parents ever bring this up or I need to come out again and “for good”.

Reblogging for the history most people want to ignore.

SIGNAL BOOST!

Interesting story.

2 days ago on July 20th, 2014 | J | 491,568 notes
honestly curious, why does it offend you?

Anonymous

perfectlyerik:

i see lucy as a racist film that plays on negative stereotypes while hiding behind the cover of (white) feminism. 

all this film has done is switch out the white man for a white woman. it’s still a film about a white person getting violated by the evil poc, then gaining power and wiping them out. 

here’s 2 of my favourite scenes from the trailer: 

image

from top to left to right:

KEEP CLEAN 保持清潔,APPLE 蘋果,ONION 洋蔥,GRAPE 葡萄,CHAIR 椅子,TOMATO 番茄

traditional chinese is an actual written language used by millions of people, not symbols to be thrown around at the whim of set designers because they look cool and idk, serves to create a menacing asian atmosphere. this is so disrespectful, and made even worse by the fact that this film in set it taipei, taiwan where the official written language is traditional chinese.

it doesn’t matter that this film caters to a primarily “white” audience who won’t be able to read it, the language and culture of taiwan isn’t something for you to twist and use as you deem fit because it’s “exotic.” 

image

lucy shoots a guy for not being able to speak english. 

she l i t e r a l l y shoots this taiwanese taxi driver, in taiwan for not being able to speak english. she’s in taipei and she’s shooting people as they are of no use to her because they don’t speak english. 

just think about the sort of message that’s sending out. she’s not being “bad-ass strong female character who takes no shit,” she’s saying that english is useful and better. this is the type of harmful ideology that stretches all the way back from when western countries were colonising and forcing their language and customs on other countries. 

let me explain with a real life example. i was born in new zealand to two taiwanese parents. i am fluent in english, but mandarin is conversational at best. my friends in taiwan say that i am “so lucky” to speak fluent english, when they are fluent in mandarin and their english level is no worse than my mandarin. they tell me that they want to perfect their english but in the same breath tell me that mandarin isn’t worth perfecting because i have english and that’s “enough”. they also tell me how pretty my white friends are when they see pictures.

this is the type of neo imperialism ideology that they’ve grown up buying into. it honestly hurts and frustrates me that they belittle their own culture like this, honestly believing that the western world is superior. this is the type of neo imperialism ideology that this film (hopefully unintentionally) promotes: white people are better and will save the day. 

if they wanted to film a movie about a white women getting back at those who had violated her, why not film it in a western country? if they wanted to film it in taiwan, why not find an asian lead actress?

i do agree that we need more women protagonists in action/superhero movies, but not like this. its not okay that the female lead needs to be kidnapped and have her body cut open without her consent in order to gain her powers, and those said those powers do not make any of this racist bullshit okay. 

i am just so tired and angry of poc always being brushed off to the side as either props or villains in mainstream media. 

as a poc, it’s so frustrating to see that the of the standard of beauty still white women when we live in multi-cultural societies and a diverse world. 

feminism is about equality. a film in which poc are presented as evil and inferior before being killed off by a superior white woman does not promote equality. 

2 days ago on July 20th, 2014 | J | 30,085 notes

HIJABI COSPLAYS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

ofinkandlurking:

thatweirdkiddyouknow:

LOOK AT THIS

image

ATTACK ON TITAN!

image

STAR WARS!!

image

CHOBITS!!!

image

HOMESTUCK!!!

image

VOCALOID!!

image

LOLITA!!!

image

HIJABI COSPLAYS!!!!

Click pics for sources (if anyone recagnizes the last one, please link to her too!)

Last one looks like demon hunter from Diablo 3

2 days ago on July 20th, 2014 | J | 5,485 notes

outcense:

outcense:

"you’re gay/bi? I’m sorry but like… how do I know you won’t have a crush on me?" because you just said that

im glad this post is still a thing

2 days ago on July 20th, 2014 | J | 83,164 notes

sizvideos:

Video - Follow us

2 days ago on July 20th, 2014 | J | 43,152 notes

cheesoisuncool:

i keep seeing the words coffee shop au without knowing what they mean. a coffee shop universe? alternate universe where there are coffee shops. friends, i have some good news for you about this universe that we live in

3 days ago on July 19th, 2014 | J | 43,706 notes

ekoenig:

*sunlight hits your laptop screen*

wow 

every piece of dust in the world

it’s here

3 days ago on July 19th, 2014 | J | 339,912 notes

deerekhale:

*sirius black voice* remus will you kill this spider for me

*remus lupin voice* is it trying to hurt you, sirius

*sirius black voice* its on my bed and hurting my heart 

*quiet james potter voice* engorgio

*loud, horrified sirius black shrieking*

3 days ago on July 19th, 2014 | J | 40,274 notes

ps-meade:

the character development in this show is pretty great

3 days ago on July 19th, 2014 | J | 6,156 notes

shewolfshaman:

ceshira:

ceshira:

Brave Soldier Boy…

image

image

image

…comes marching home.

I didn’t think it was possible but this post got better!

4 days ago on July 19th, 2014 | J | 128,457 notes

chicagochi:

allotherfairiesfly:

Will this about cover it? This should cover it just fine, Lottie!

I just love Lottie’s adorable little jump here!!!

I love how Tiana was never too proud to accept help from friends, and the movie didn’t show this as making her any less hard working or devoted. I think that’s an important lesson.

Similarly, Lottie was always giving and loving, even though she was by all counts supposedly a spoiled brat. This is truly one of my favorite Disney friendships.

4 days ago on July 19th, 2014 | J | 37,116 notes